ATi R600

[Comby]

http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/31977/135/
Skor to patri do sekcie procesory, ale mna zaujalo, ze R600 ma zapojeny len jeden napajaci PCIe konektor z dvoch.

[husky14]

.....ale mna zaujalo, ze R600 ma zapojeny len jeden napajaci PCIe konektor z dvoch.

Asi to bude stacit (na 2D)....

[Masster]

No tak ti co doufali, ze "spatny" vykon v DX9 nic neznamena a ze to DX10 zachrani, tak timhle asi nebudou nadseni.



http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-763485-1-1.html

[xjohny]

Me by zajimalo, co je mysleno timhle
http://ati.amd.com/online/getall3/

[Pavlis]

Me by zajimalo, co je mysleno timhle

rek bych Kuma+R600+RD790

[Masster]

Fantastic specs don't always add up to a lead in real-world applications, but ATI has been able to convert its technological advantages into some lethal framerates. It didn't beat the 640MB version of the 8800 GTS in all of our game tests, but it did come awfully close (see chart, below). The advantage is greatest at a resolution of 1,024x768, which suggests that the less detail you want to stack on, the better this card will prove.

http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/reviews/i...m?reviewid=834

[Q]

s kazdyma novyma ovladacema stoupa vykon v desitkach procent...pockejme si...

[Pavlis]

No tak ti co doufali, ze "spatny" vykon v DX9 nic neznamena a ze to DX10 zachrani, tak timhle asi nebudou nadseni.

tady je to zase naopak

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=5253

[no-X]

No tak ti co doufali, ze "spatny" vykon v DX9 nic neznamena a ze to DX10 zachrani, tak timhle asi nebudou nadseni.

http://we.pcinlife.com/thread-763485-1-1.html

hmm, ale ještě k tomu chybí dost podstatná poznámka:

Note that this implementation is relatively unoptimized; it's more of a "proof of concept". In particular, the shadow split locations could be chosen a lot more sensibly, and even some basic frustum culling would greatly improve the performance of rendering the different shadow map splits.

[dexterav]

najhoršie je že sú prakticky iba 2 druhy testov...
prepadák a šupa

[Masster]

8.37


1600x1200 FA@16x, FAA@4x SS
2900XT/8800GTS:
min:17/20
med:35/37
max:64/70

1920x1200 FA@16x, FAA@4x SS
2900XT/8800GTS:
min:16/16
med:30/32
max:55/57


2900XT - 8.37- 8800GTS - 158.19 -

1600x1200 FA@16x, FAA@4x no SShadows,
2900XT/8800GTS:
min:20/30
med:59/58
max:124/130

1920x1200 FA@16x, FAA@4x no SShadows,
2900XT/8800GTS:
min:19/27
med:51/51
max:111/104


STALKER 1600x1200 all maximum, AFMax noAA - C2 3200

Timedemo1: Av: 37,55, Min: 19,79, Max: 123,84, Mid: 39,52
Timedemo2: Av: 60,14, Min: 37,60, Max: 291,21, Mid: 65,48

8.36

Timedemo1: Average: 33,12, Min: 17,51, Max: 88,29, Mid: 35,51
Timedemo2: Average: 50,50, Min: 31,28, Max: 282,81, Mid: 56,67

A dalsi

Driver: 8.37-4, CPU: E6700, from europes biggest PC-Magazine ct

Oblivion, HDR on

1280 X 1024 noAA/noAF

2900 XT 49 fps
88 GTS 48 fps
88 GTX 48 fps

1280 X 1024 AA 4X / noAF

2900 XT 39 fps
88 GTS 46 fps
88 GTX 48 fps

1280 x1024 AA 8X / noAF

HD 2900 XT 17 fps
88 GTS 28 fps
88 GTX 39 fps


PREY

1600 x 1200 AA 8X / AF 16X

HD 2900 XT 43 fps
88 GTS 37 fps
88 GTX 50 fps

[no-X]

8.37...

Výsledky z 8.37 jsou už poněkud outdated, když už pár dní existují 8.38:

8.37



8.38

[Sharker]

najhoršie je že sú prakticky iba 2 druhy testov...
prepadák a šupa

Tak si vyber ..... poradim ti .. podla infa od ludi co tu kartu UZ maju tak sa mame na co tesit .... vykonovy prepadak to nieje ..

[dexterav]

ja vyberať nepotrebujem...
kto ju má?