[PC] i7-3770K @4.5 GHz w/Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 | 32 GB Patriot G2 | Asus P8Z77-V Deluxe | Crucial M4 256 GB | 2x WD20EZRX RAID1 | BD-RE LG GBW-H20L | Sapphire HD7750 Ultimate | Enermax Revolution87+ 550W | Antec Solo II | Asus Xonar Phoebus + AKG K271 MkII | NEC PA231W + SVII + Spyder3EE
[Photo] Nikon D700 + MB-D10 | AF-S 16-35/4G VR | AF-S 24-120/4G VR | AF-S 50/1.4G | AF-S 60/2.8G | AF-S 85/1.8G | AF-S 70-200/2.8G VRII | TC-17E II | SB-900 | Transcend cards | Heliopan + Formatt filters | Gitzo support | Kata + Tamrac bags
You're guaranteed to miss 100% of the shots you don't take. (Wayne Gretzky)
Specifikacie uvadzaju rozdielne velkosti a mpix a full RAWy aj JPEGy maju rozdielny pocet pixlov.
350D -> 22.2 x 14.8 mm, 8.2mpix, 8mpix efektivne, JPEG = 3456x2304, fullRAW = 3472x2312
30D -> 22.5 x 15.0 mm, 8.5mpix, 8.2mpix efektivne, JPEG = 3504x2336, fullRAW neviem
20D -> rovnake parametre ako 30D
Oni 20/30D skutocne viditelne menej sumia ako 350D. Co som si porovnaval fotky s tominekom, tak si dovolim tvrdit, ze 30D je na iso3200 rovnako az menej zasumena ako 350D na iso1600.
[edit]
Tak podla grafomana Askeyho sumi na iso3200 20D viac ale podstatna informacia je, ze 350D sumi dokonca viac ako 300D (co je logicke vzhladom na pocet mpix a rovnakej kategorii)...
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos350d/page19.asp
Naposledy upravil PiT; 24.08.2006 v 10:47.
And down we go again, under the relentless wawes, into the arms of calm breakers, into bayou of forgotten dreams
Like sand slipping through my fingers, nothing ever lasts, ever will
Toto téma si právě prohlíží 1 uživatelů. (0 registrovaných a 1 anonymních)