
Původně odeslal
monsoon
Pod Win mi iperf dost haluzi, teda ona je otazka, zdali haluzi iperf nebo win.
Na linuxu jsem pustil server a z nekolika win stanic jsem zkousel rychlost - vzdy byl vysledek kolem 450 - 500 Mbps, mezi linuxama si to beha klidne 950Mbps.
Jestli je chyba ve windows, tak by to asi castecne vysvetlovalo moji marnou snahu o rozjeti nejakeho slusneho NAS. Samba - 35MBps, NFS - 40MBps

, mezi linuxama NFS - 110MBps, pricemz vic nedaji disky.
zkus iperfu na woknech dat parametr jen tak pro info ... dve pc (XP 64 a Linux 2.6) propojene krizenym kabelem
Kód:
D:\soft\iperf-1.1.1-win32>iperf.exe -c 192.168.1.1
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.1.1, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 8.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[832] local 192.168.1.2 port 3539 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[832] 0.0-10.0 sec 351 MBytes 280 Mbits/sec
D:\soft\iperf-1.1.1-win32>iperf.exe -c 192.168.1.1 -l 64k
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.1.1, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 8.0 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[836] local 192.168.1.2 port 3540 connected with 192.168.1.1 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[836] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.1 GBytes 881 Mbits/sec
a jen pro porovnani ... co ukazuje server ...
Kód:
[ 4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.2 port 3539
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 351 MBytes 294 Mbits/sec
[ 4] local 192.168.1.1 port 5001 connected with 192.168.1.2 port 3540
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.08 GBytes 924 Mbits/sec