Gentoo 2005.0 Ati fglrx

[Gargamel]

Jak je to s Gentoo 2006.1 ? ati-drivers-8.28.8 hlasi pri emerge cannot stat 'fglrx.ko':no such file or directory
ja uz nevim jak se s tim porvat, novejsi ovladace nejsou, samotny gentoo bezi od vcerejska, na forech jsem zatim funknci reseni nenasel...

Jedu na tom uz vic nez rok a nemam problem. Pri instalaci ebuildu se kompiluje modul do jadra, tak se ujisti, ze mas spravny /usr/src/linux symlink a funkcni jadro v nem. Doporucuju sledovat hlasky emerge

[Airwolf]

Jedu na tom uz vic nez rok a nemam problem. Pri instalaci ebuildu se kompiluje modul do jadra, tak se ujisti, ze mas spravny /usr/src/linux symlink a funkcni jadro v nem. Doporucuju sledovat hlasky emerge

symlink je v poradku, odkazuje na 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 jadro

chyby v emergu jsou tyto:

Building DRM module...
Makefile:486: /usr/src/linux-2.6.17-gentoo-r8/arch/x86/Makefile:no such file or directory
make: *** no rule to make target 'adresa o radek vyse'.Stop
make leaving directory
DRM module not built
Source compiled
test phase [not enabled]
installing ati-drivers-8.28.8 into /var/tmp/portage/ati-drivers-8.28.8/image category x11-drivers
installing fglrx module
install: cannot stat 'fglrx.ko': no such file or directory

vypis stacku a konec...

nevim proc DRM hleda na tamte ceste, tam zadny adresar x86 neexistuje...

vyreseno> CCHOST flag byl spatne nastaven

[lcdc]

Ja mam v glxgears :

lcdc@lcdc-13 ~ $ glxgears
6534 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1306.582 FPS
4990 frames in 5.0 seconds = 997.995 FPS
4959 frames in 5.0 seconds = 991.797 FPS
4988 frames in 5.0 seconds = 997.596 FPS

Je to na ATI 9600. Je to normalne? Inac vsetko ide normalne, testoval som hru "racer" a vsetko ok.

[..::Ozzy::..]

Ja mam v glxgears :

lcdc@lcdc-13 ~ $ glxgears
6534 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1306.582 FPS
4990 frames in 5.0 seconds = 997.995 FPS
4959 frames in 5.0 seconds = 991.797 FPS
4988 frames in 5.0 seconds = 997.596 FPS

Je to na ATI 9600. Je to normalne? Inac vsetko ide normalne, testoval som hru "racer" a vsetko ok.

spíš se podívej jestli v glxinfo máš

direct rendering: Yes

tahle čísla v glxgears jsou lehce matoucí..... např... když nechám ty kolečka běžet tak tam mam neco kolem 3,500, ale když shodim všechna okna do lišty a nechám jen konzoli s výpisem tak to naskočí kolem 5000.... takže tohle měření neni vůbec přesné... to vše na R9600XT

[Rainbow]

No samozrejme, ze to pojde rychlejsie, ked sa to nikam nemusi vykreslovat...

[lcdc]

spíš se podívej jestli v glxinfo máš

direct rendering: Yes

Ano, mam

name of display: :0.0
display: :0  screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.2
server glx extensions:
    GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating,
    GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_SGI_make_current_read,
    GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_hyperpipe, GLX_SGIX_swap_barrier,
    GLX_SGIX_fbconfig
client glx vendor string: ATI
client glx version string: 1.3

Rozlisenie mam 1280x1024 a nove meranie je to iste:

lcdc@lcdc-13 ~ $ glxgears
5003 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.449 FPS
4988 frames in 5.0 seconds = 997.461 FPS
5001 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.061 FPS
5001 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.059 FPS
5001 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.060 FPS
5001 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.059 FPS
4980 frames in 5.0 seconds = 995.863 FPS
5001 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.057 FPS
5001 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.063 FPS
5001 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.056 FPS
5001 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1000.060 FPS

[NeMeM9aA]

to lcdc:
pokud vse funguje tak bych to neresil.

Moje x800pro@XT PE s X2@2650 dava:

nemem9aa@localhost ~ $ glxgears 
1216 frames in 5.0 seconds = 243.181 FPS
1188 frames in 5.0 seconds = 237.587 FPS
1194 frames in 5.0 seconds = 238.776 FPS
1178 frames in 5.0 seconds = 235.598 FPS

a vubec nezalezi na taktu (meneno pomoci rovclock). fgl_glxgears uz dava realnejsi vysledky na taktu zavisle. Dulezite je, ze to ve hrach ma dostatecny vykon (coz je u me celkem irrelevatni, protoze se openGL hry zaseknou cca do 10minut a to natvrdo a pak se samovolne resetuje komp).

//edit: jinak na starsim jadre a se starsima ovladacema jsem mel myslim neco pres 10k bodiku

[lcdc]

A po pretaktovani cez rovclock:

rovclock -i
Radeon overclock 0.6e by Hasw (hasw@hasw.net)

Found ATI card on 02:00, device id: 0x4150
I/O base address: 0xc000
Video BIOS shadow found @ 0xc0000
Reference clock from BIOS: 27.0 MHz
Memory size: 131072 kB
Memory channels: 1, CD,CH only: 0
tRcdRD:   5
tRcdWR:   3
tRP:      4
tRAS:     17
tRRD:     2
tR2W-CL:  3
tWR:      3
tW2R:     2
tW2Rsb:   1
tR2R:     2
tRFC:     15
tWL(0.5): 2
tCAS:     3
tCMD:     0
tSTR:     1
XTAL: 27.0 MHz, RefDiv: 12

Core: 378.0 MHz, Mem: 229.50 MHz

je vysledok taky isty ako pri default:

glxgears
4992 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.360 FPS
4994 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.658 FPS
4993 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.465 FPS
4995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.859 FPS
4995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.863 FPS
4962 frames in 5.0 seconds = 992.265 FPS

Kde moze byt problem?

[LM]

je vysledok taky isty ako pri default:

glxgears
4992 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.360 FPS
4994 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.658 FPS
4993 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.465 FPS
4995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.859 FPS
4995 frames in 5.0 seconds = 998.863 FPS
4962 frames in 5.0 seconds = 992.265 FPS

Kde moze byt problem?

ati drivers?

2.6.17-gentoo-r4
nvidia-legacy-drivers-1.0.7184
gf2mx400@default

lukas@jukebox ~ $ glxgears
3922 frames in 5.0 seconds = 784.284 FPS
4003 frames in 5.0 seconds = 800.463 FPS
3912 frames in 5.0 seconds = 782.286 FPS
3999 frames in 5.0 seconds = 799.695 FPS
3899 frames in 5.0 seconds = 779.705 FPS
3999 frames in 5.0 seconds = 799.673 FPS
3882 frames in 5.0 seconds = 776.327 FPS