Citace Původně odeslal aless
Škoda, že neni o pár cm vyšší aby se vešel cely 120mm ventylátor ted trochu čouhá zespodu což snižuje efektivnost.
Je pry nizsi proto, aby se vesel do standardnich casu s vyskou 19cm.
As for Tuniq Tower 120, the manufacturer claims that it will fit onto the majority of boards and into most mid- and full-tower cases out there, because its heatsink fins start at 5.5cm above the mainboard PCB and no electronic components should be in the way at that height. The cooler itself is only 15.5cm high, while the standard case depth is 19cm.


Citace Původně odeslal Kankal
Bohuzel mam o vysledcich teto recenze pochyby.

Slabinou recenze jsou vetraky a teplota okoli. Testy Tuniq Tower byly provedeny s pribalenym chladicem na 1600 otackach, porovnavane chladice byly testovany s jinymi vetraky. Vubec zde nepadla zminka o prutoku pribaleneho vetraku Tuniqu, ani o srovnani jeho prutoku s vetraky pouzitymi u ostatnich chladicu. Vysledky ostatnich chladicu byly prevzaty z predchoziho testu s tim, ze test probehl ve stejnem prostredi. Teplota okoli vsak neni zminena a mam pochyby, zda byla vubec merena. Zda se, ze metodologicky to recenzenti dost odflakli, takze doporucuju pockat na dalsi recenze.
S tim vetrakem s tebou souhlasim, pouzili vetrak dodany k chladici s 9ti lopatkama misto 7mi, kterej urcite vysledek pozitivne ovlivnil.


Ke zbytku bych mel nekolik pripominek.


Vsechny testy byly provadeny v "thermal chamber" s teplotou 30 st. C.
So, the testbed with the overclocked to 4GHz processors was placed inside a thermal chamber with the constant temperature maintained at 30 st. C.
Po dosazeni tak dobrych vysledku chladicem Tuniq provedl znovu test s 2x znovu nasazenym Zalmanem a jeho vysledky byly stejne jako ve starsim testu.
Well, let’s remove the Tuniq Tower 120 cooler and install Zalman CNPS9500 LED instead. Let’s see what the repeated tests will produce:

nasleduje graf s prubehem teplot z noveho testu s Zalmanem CNPS9500 LED

This was a truly unexpected result! The cooler didn’t perform any better, and simply repeated the results obtained in the previous test session. Just to make sure I removed the cooler and reinstalled it again, but nothing happened: 47o C in idle mode and 60o C under workload. It could mean only one thing: it’s time we gave up our search for missing differences and admitted the evident: there are no differences in the testing environments and conditions, the comparison is absolutely correct. Simply the new Tuniq Tower 120 cooler is a much more efficient solution than its famous rivals.
Stejne to chce dalsi testy, ktery by potvrdily, ze ten chladic je fakt tak dobrej.