Citace Původně odeslal jan555 Zobrazit příspěvek
Test seťáku na SLRGear, solidní výsledky na takového cvrčka: http://www.slrgear.com/reviews/showp...ct/1227/cat/69
Tak zpátky na stromy - Photozone stáhnul test 14-45 a teď uveřejnili re-test a důvody k tomu jsou víc než "zajímavé":

Citace Původně odeslal Photozone
The initial test of the lens produced invalid results - less so because of the lens but because Panasonic asked Adobe to apply automatic corrections to RAW images (under the hood that is). These modifications corrected most of the problems with respect to distortions, CAs as well as vignetting but they also caused a reduction of the field-of-view and a deterioration of the resolution figures (because the image is stretched here). However, the PZ tests are about the principal lens performance and not the performance after (excessive) post-processing thus we'll be using RawTherapee for these tests. Finally it is not guaranteed that these corrections are also performed on other/future micro-4/3 bodies and users could also prefer RAW-converters other than ACR/Silkypix.
Link: http://www.photozone.de/olympus--fou...onic_1445_3556

Pro P&S amatéry je to asi prima, ale pokud je to pravda, tak se domnívám, že to Panasonic trochu přehnal. Zajímavé je to tak jak tak.