DSLR vs. (kino)film

[MadCap]

ten vyrez je "ressed-up" ale zjavne dost dementnou metodou ... inak by bol rovnako dobry/zly
"Ignoring the possibility of superior performance from medium format film by having drum scans made (which I don't normally do — not at $100 - $300 per scan) I am only left with the conclusion that I no longer retain any advantage in shooting medium format film. It's more expensive, less convenient and produces lower quality images. The range of lenses available to me is much greater with 35mm digital, including the availability of longer lenses, wider lenses, more zooms, Image Stabilization, wider aperture primes, and tilt / shift lenses. You can see where I'm going, can't you?"
Toto pochopil uz kazdy v "industry", kto nie, tak asi zomiera hladom alebo mu to trva strasne dlho a plati nechutne prachy aby z toho vobec cosi vypadlo ...

EDIT:
http://www.zive.cz/archivcasopisu/Di...7&Tit=DIGIfoto
V tomto cisle to porovnavali kolegovia z digifoto a vyslo im to tak nejak rovnako