Matrox Parhelia-512 v komplu :-) ...

... sice jen na par dni, ale i tak :drool:

zatim jsem jen nainstalil drivery (a nikde nenasel nastaveni Gamma monitoru, jen textu)

tak pokud vas zajima nejakej benchmark, hra (pokud ji mam a muzu jich testnout celkem dost :-)) nebo cokoli jinyho (treba screenshot s 16x FAA), tak to zkusim a postnu semka

zkusim asi i surround gaming, tri monitory mam, akorat zatim nevim, jestli potrebuju treba pro UT2003 nebo Q3A i nejakej patch, protoze rozliseni s tolika body na sirku tam neni, no uvidima, az si pohraju ...

tak nikoho nic nezajima, tak si tady asi pokecam sam ;D

no surround gaming zatim jen v Reef demu (s 16x FAA v 1024x768 fakt plynula parada a ukazuje to moznosti Parhelie)

projel jsme benchmarky - zatim zhruba 3dmark03 - 700b, 3dmark01 - 7800b, codecreatures - 1300b, aquamark3 - 17800b, aquamark2 - 48fps, splinter cell - okolo 7-8 fps (very high, mapa se shaderovym morem), ut2003 benchmark.exe botmatch 1024x768 - asi 68 fps (flyby asi 110fps), rtcw checkpoint 1024x768 - 70 fps

vic uz ted zpameti nevypotim

gamma korekce jen prostrednictvim programu Coloreal, kterej je na Cd a integruje se pak i do driveru, me by stacilo radsi neco min profi

Tak já se tedy přidám :wink:

Vidím,že 3DMarky jí moc nevoní,ale v hrách není zase tak špatná :-)
Zkoušel jsi ji taky přetaktovat?
Pokud vím,má 256MB DDR,co tam jsou za čipy,atd.....

Osobně jsem viděl Parhelii v akci u nějaké automobilové arkády,na třech monitorech a bylo to úžasné :D

Pokud bys mel moznost ji testnout s aktualnima driverama pod SpecViewPerf 7 bylo by to super

a nezapomen aperture size na 128

Katoo: Hry jeste poradne testnu, uvidime jak Gun Metal, Halo, F1 Challenge ...

Je to verze se 128MB pameti, cipy 3.3ns Infineon. Takt mi zatim hlasi jen Powerstrip a HWinfo32 a je zajimavy - 207/259 MHz (GPU/mem).

Deekay: Zatim mam doma predposledni drivery 1.5.0.107 (vysli tusim uz 108) a ten Spec7 si zrovna jdu zase dat na HDD a vysledky postnu (mam v nem i celkem databazi k porovnani, ale zadnou ze special jako Wildcat ci tak ne).

Jeste by to chtelo nejakou aplikaci, mam jen specMAYA5 a Cinebench a bojim se, ze oboje je vic o celem systemu nez karte.

Aperturu, zkontroluju, mozna to mam na 256MB, no aspon bude srovnani.

No tak zkus pak i s ruznejma velikostma aperture projet testy... sem zvedav na vysledky

Nejdriv si zanadavam na ASUS A7V600, mam v BIOSu nastaveno 128MB a nejde to zmenit, asi nejaka chyba 007 beta 3 biosu nebo moje lamerstvi. Kazdopadne Powerstrip mi s timto nastavenim hlasi 256 MB, takze nevim, musim poresit.

Prinesu ale i vysledky z P4 3.2 na i865PE z Computerackeho TestLabu, tam snad vse poslape jak hodinky.

Takze zatim jen vysledky s timto (nevim jakym Aperture size) a sestavou 1 v signature. Jeste zatim omluva za ten Spec7, musim to znova stahnout, na CD mi ZIP hlasi CRC error :-(. Ale urcite stahnu a namerim.

3DMark 2001 Score 7840

Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 111.3 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 59.5 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 108.5 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 65.2 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 126.9 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 65.3 fps
Game 4 - Nature 28.6 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 679.5 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2516.6 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 22.6 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 10.2 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 116.4 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 92.6 fps
Vertex Shader 89.2 fps
Pixel Shader 88.3 fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 68.6 fps
Point Sprites 11.4 MSprites/s

-----------------------------------------------------------
Splinter Cell 1.2b

Demo name: beyond3d.bin
1024x768 Average= 12.771 fps, min 7.552 fps, max 23.622 fps. Effects quality= VERYHIGH
1600x1200 Average= 7.380 fps, min 3.931 fps, max 11.363 fps. Effects quality= VERYHIGH

-----------------------------------------------------------
Return to Castle Wolfenstein

Demo name: checkpoint.dm_60
1024x768 42.6 seconds: 69.1 fps
1600x1200 68.6 seconds: 42.9 fps

-----------------------------------------------------------
Unreal II: The Awakening

1024x768 Average: 51.38 Unreal 829, 27.11 Min, 96.61 Max,
1600x1200 Average: 27.42 Unreal 829, 14.42 Min, 45.69 Max,

-----------------------------------------------------------
3DMark03

1024 x 768 841 3DMarks

-----------------------------------------------------------
ChameleonMark

1024x768 glass= 64.4258 fps, real= 96.1724 fps, shiny= 65.0849 fps, Average= 75.228 fps.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Unreal Tournament 2003

1024x768 flyby - 103.404831 botmatch - 63.256226

-----------------------------------------------------------
Quake III Arena

Demo name: demo001
1024x768 7.5 seconds: 179.1 fps
1600x1200 22.3 seconds: 60.4 fps

-----------------------------------------------------------
Vulpine GLmark by I-D Media AG

Command line:
-benchmark -fullscreen -advanced -s3tc -highdetail -res 1024 768 -colorbits 32

-texturebits 32
Average fps : 30.2

-----------------------------------------------------------
Gun Metal

1024x768 noAA full detail benchmark1: 17.30 fps

-----------------------------------------------------------
Codecreatures Benchmark Pro

Overall:
1024x768: 17.4 fps
1280x1024: 13.3 fps
1600x1200: 10.0 fps

-----------------------------------------------------------
D3DVillageMark v1.20

Average FPS: 78
Benchmark: 1800 frames

Driver: MTXPARHD.dll
Description: Matrox Parhelia 128MB - English
Version: 6.13.01.1373

Resolution: 1024x768x16
HAL: ON
T&L: ON
Trilinear: ON
Texture compression: ON
Multitexture: 3 layers
Max. Texture used: 1024x1024

CPU Description: AMD K7 (Athlon)
CPU Speed: 2100 Mhz.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Aquamark 3

1024x768x32, FSAA off, Max.Aniso 4 (default) - 17,456

-----------------------------------------------------------
Aquamark 2.1

1024x768x32, PS On, Tex size: 24MB (default) - 44.9 fps

-----------------------------------------------------------


4x FAA results:

Splinter Cell 1.2b

Demo name: beyond3d.bin
1024x768 Average= 6.471 fps, min 2.927 fps, max 16.595 fps. Effects quality= VERYHIGH

-----------------------------------------------------------
Return to Castle Wolfenstein

Demo name: checkpoint.dm_60
1024x768 143.5 seconds: 20.5 fps

-----------------------------------------------------------
Unreal II: The Awakening

1024x768 Average: 16.87 Unreal 829, 9.21 Min, 25.55 Max,

-----------------------------------------------------------
3DMark03

1024 x 768 229 3DMarks


-----------------------------------------------------------
ChameleonMark

1024x768 glass= 18.8346 fps, real= 26.2488 fps, shiny= 18.8894 fps, Average= 21.324 fps.

-----------------------------------------------------------
3DMark2001 SE Pro

3DMark Score 2141
-----------------------------------------------------------
Unreal Tournament 2003

1024x768 flyby - 23.006458 botmatch - 18.049084

-----------------------------------------------------------
Quake III Arena

Demo name: demo001
800x600 not selected
1024x768 23.1 seconds: 58.2 fps
1600x1200 58.9 seconds: 22.8 fps

-----------------------------------------------------------
Vulpine GLmark by I-D Media AG

Command line:
-benchmark -fullscreen -advanced -s3tc -highdetail -res 1024 768 -colorbits 32

-texturebits 32
Average fps : 18.2

-----------------------------------------------------------


Strasne se mi libi toto (Matrox Glyph AA):

Bez:
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjahoda/hw/pa..._noGlyphAA.png

S:
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjahoda/hw/pa...xt_GlyphAA.png



Takto se karta hlasi v Powerstripu:
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjahoda/hw/pa...strip_info.png


A takto v RivaTuneru:
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjahoda/hw/pa...r_info_pci.png


Defaultne je vypnuto Fast Writes, tak jsem to zapnul (pomoci RivaTuneru), ale vysledky se nezmenily, jen s FSAA jsou chyby texturingu, tak nevim, jestli je to tim, zkusim zase vypnout.

Dalsi podrobne vysledky:
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjahoda/hw/parhelia/

Srovnaval jsem (subjektivne) kvalitu obrazu na mym moncku od 1024x768@120Hz az po 1600x1200@85Hz a podle me uz dnesni Radeony a GF FX s nejlepsim obrazem nejsou horsi, alespon v techto rozlisenich.

Taky me trochu mrzi vetsi hlucnost chladice, prece jen, tam bych cekal vetsi kvalitu, ta je naopak uzasna u kabely, tak tlusty S-Video nebo VGA kabel jsem snad jeste nevidel.

no mirek, tak si daj v testlabe bacha na to na akom takte bezi ten procak, posledne som ho musel underclocknut :oops: aby ta svina nepadala :( je tam teraz totiz nejaka sahla doska Aopen kedze intel bonanza sa nejak nemala rada s tym ES co je vovnutri ... ;D inak slusne vyslekdy na Matroxa ;) a ten spec by mohol dopadnut tiez slusne ;)
MadCap

Marku jeste zkus pripojit dva monitory a srovnej sekundarni vystup z nakeho Radeonu se sekundarnim na Matroxu, protoze treba na my R9000 Sapphire je primar super ale sekundar co do kvality tristni.

Ja se hlavne tesim na SpecViewPerf

Taky zkus subjektivne ohodnotit kvalitu overlay a TVvystupu pokud ams nakou slusnejsi TV ;D

iky :wink:

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal Mirek

-----------------------------------------------------------
3DMark03

1024 x 768 841 3DMarks

-----------------------------------------------------------

---

jaktoze tak malo ??? ??? , ja mel vzdycky za to, ze Parhelia je full DX9 , jeste pred tim nez vysla, psali ze to bude (zatim) jedina dx9 karta na trhu... a to ja se svou fx5200 64b mam 1200bodu ???

Madcap: V poho, jestli sis vsimnul, dal jsem tam i novej chladic, abysme slyseli hlucnost grafick (AC Super Silent 4M) a kdyz na to fouka jeste pridavne vetrak, tak vse v pohode, nema to pres 58 stupnu. Preziva to moje benchmarky (ted celodenni) grafik, tak to musi byt v poho :-) Promazal jsem registry, nastavil casovani, ted uz jen aby me to pres testy nikdo nezmenil ;-)

Deekay: Kvalitu na druhem monitoru zkusim, s TV te zklamu, nic lepsi nez dve 50Hz TV se SCARTem nemam, zbytecne cokoli zkouset ...

Tomas: Parhelia podporuje Vertex Shader 2.0 ale Pixel Shader tusim jen 1.3, takze je full DX8 a partial DX9. Treba Gun Metal da docela slusnej vysledek, pac presne pouziva VS 2.0 a PS 1.1. V 3dmark03 neprojde vubec Mother Nature, co chce PS 2.0.

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal _Tomas

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal Mirek

-----------------------------------------------------------
3DMark03

1024 x 768 841 3DMarks

-----------------------------------------------------------

---

jaktoze tak malo ??? ??? , ja mel vzdycky za to, ze Parhelia je full DX9 , jeste pred tim nez vysla, psali ze to bude (zatim) jedina dx9 karta na trhu... a to ja se svou fx5200 64b mam 1200bodu ???

---

To protože 3dMark vypíná některé funkce Parhelie a to ji zpomaluje - třeba bez FAA16 běží pomaleji než s ním.

:drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool:

mno.. ja mel Parheliu vzdycky celkem rad... zkousel jsi ji taktovat? klidne pripoj i 50Hz telku a porovnej sncim starsim jestli se ti chce... GF3 atd... jak na tom jedou hry? treba NFS U v plnych detailech atd...? co to hrani na 3 monitorech? stoji to za to? staci ji vykon? jaky je pak vykonovy pokles? funguje FAA bez problemu? hod sem nejaky obrazek FAA16x a FSAA4x jine karty... ufff... to je ale otazek :D ;D

jinak pro srovnani muj Hercul 8500LE (250/250) na tulenovi 1300, cat 3.5 default/4AA

3D Mark 2001SE
6200 bodu/2223
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 83.6 fps/30.6
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 30.1 fps/21.1
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 112.8 fps/27.6
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 64.2 fps/21.6
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 86.2 fps/26.1
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 38.0 fps/16.8
Game 4 - Nature 35.1 fps/9.5
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 716.5 MTexels/s/138.8
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 1876.6 MTexels/s/445.1
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 25.7 MTriangles/s/17.2
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 8.8 MTriangles/s/7.3
Environment Bump Mapping 103.4 fps/30.3
DOT3 Bump Mapping 69.4 fps/19.3
Vertex Shader 74.6 fps/27.5
Pixel Shader 65.0 fps/20.2
Advanced Pixel Shader 78.3 fps/21.6
Point Sprites 22.0 MSprites/s/5.6

Tu parheliu mas na tom bartonoj? Zkus FS2004 1280x1024 vsecko na max kolik budes mit FPS...treba nejaky velky letiste - zkus Londyn-Heathrow

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal Mirek

Tomas: Parhelia podporuje Vertex Shader 2.0 ale Pixel Shader tusim jen 1.3, takze je full DX8 a partial DX9. Treba Gun Metal da docela slusnej vysledek, pac presne pouziva VS 2.0 a PS 1.1. V 3dmark03 neprojde vubec Mother Nature, co chce PS 2.0.

---

A navíc ještě nemá implementované funkce na optimalizaci renderování scény(HSR,Culling,...),jako má ATi a nV. Což je pro funkci surround gaming pochopitelné,ale v single modu by to zapínat mohli :-)

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal Mirek

Zatim mam doma predposledni drivery 1.5.0.107 (vysli tusim uz 108)...

---

Uz je aj 1.6beta, ja ale parheliu nemam :)
ftp://ftp.matrox.com/pub/mga/archive...p_106_beta.exe

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal Mirek

... a ten Spec7 si zrovna jdu zase dat na HDD a vysledky postnu (mam v nem i celkem databazi k porovnani, ale zadnou ze special jako Wildcat ci tak ne)

---

Testoval som VP560 a starsie Quadro, ale vzhladom na odlisne zostavy to asi nebude porovnatelne.. :(

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal longo213

Testoval som VP560 a starsie Quadro, ale vzhladom na odlisne zostavy to asi nebude porovnatelne.. :(

---

Ta VP560 by mě zrovna zajímala. Můžeš ty výsledky někde postnout?

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal LISP

Ta VP560 by mě zrovna zajímala. Můžeš ty výsledky někde postnout?

---

Ale samozrejme :)
Stiahni si toto cislo PC_SPACE v PDF, nespominam si na ktorej strane je recenzia. Ma to asi 2MB.
http://www.pcspace.sk/download/pdf/images/09-2003.jpg

Download:
http://www.pcspace.sk/download/pdf/09-2003.pdf

Takze s ovladaci 1.6.0.78 (sestava Barton @3000+ 11x200, 512MB DDR400 2-3-3-7, ASUS A7V600 - KT600)

SpecViewPerf 7.1.1

---------- SUM_RESULTS\3DSMAX\SUMMARY.TXT
3dsmax-02 Weighted Geometric Mean = 8.629

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
drv-09 Weighted Geometric Mean = 18.15

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
dx-08 Weighted Geometric Mean = 46.26

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
light-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 9.072

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROE\SUMMARY.TXT
proe-02 Weighted Geometric Mean = 4.322

---------- SUM_RESULTS\UGS\SUMMARY.TXT
ugs-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 6.074

SpecViewPerf 7.0:


---------- SUM_RESULTS\3DSMAX\SUMMARY.TXT
3dsmax-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 8.799

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
drv-08 Weighted Geometric Mean = 18.16

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
dx-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 36.54

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
light-05 Weighted Geometric Mean = 9.161

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROE\SUMMARY.TXT
proe-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 4.328

---------- SUM_RESULTS\UGS\SUMMARY.TXT
ugs-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 6.040


Quake III Arena
v 1.11
demo001, 32 bit, max. detail, trilinear, fsaa off, sound 22kHz
640x480 194,6
800x600 182,1
1024x768 138,5
1280x1024 86,1
1600x1200 59,2


Max Payne 1.05
Final Scene No.1 (VGA-demo), 1024x768x32, Max. Detail, Trilinear, FSAA off
54.6 fps


Gun Metal
max. detail, 1024x768x32, benchmark1
17.3 fps


D3DVillageMark v1.20
Average FPS: 78


OGLVillageMark v1.20
Average FPS: 85


Comanche 4 Benchmark Results for 1024x768x32 FSAA=0 VSync=OFF DXTC=ENABLED AUDIO=OFF SHADERS=ENABLED
Frames per second: 36.75 avg
Tris per second: 7,327,298 avg


Temple Demo 1.0.6 -Benchmark-
Description, Matrox Parhelia 128MB - English
Version, 6.13.01.1421
HAL, ON
T&L, ON
Trilinear, ON
Texture compression, ON
Max. Multitexture used, 4+2
Max. Texture used, 1024x1024
Screen Res, 1024,768,32
Average FPS, 96.870262


3DMark03:
842


3DMark01SE:
3DMark Score 7866
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 112.4 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 60.0 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 108.9 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 65.3 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 126.7 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 65.3 fps
Game 4 - Nature 28.6 fps

3DMark2000:
10709 bodu

CodeCreatures (1024x768x32):
17.3 fps


X2 - The Threat

Executeable compiled Tue Aug 19 15:38:13 2003

Video Settings during test:
Screen Resolution: 1024*768*32
Bumpmapping: On
Realtime Shadows: On

System specific video settings:
Adapter name: Matrox Parhelia 128MB - English [Matrox Parhelia 128MB - English]
Vertex Shader: Hardware, version 1
Hardware T&L: Yes
Fog capabilities: W-fog Z-fog Table(Pixel)Fog VertexFog

System specific audio settings:
SecondarySampleRate (Min/Max): 100/48000
PrimaryBuffers: 1
MaxHwMixingBuffers (Static/Stream/All): 33/33/33
FreeHwMixingBuffers (Static/Stream/All): 0/0/0
MaxHw3DBuffers (Static/Stream/All): 33/33/33
FreeHw3DBuffers (Static/Stream/All): 0/0/0
HwMemBytes (Free/Total/MaxContigFree): 0/0/0
UnlockTransferRateHwBuffers: 0
PlayCpuOverheadSwBuffers: 0
Flags: CERTIFIED CONTINUOUSRATE PRIMARY16BIT PRIMARY8BIT PRIMARYMOMO PRIMARYSTEREO SECONDARY16BIT SECONDARY8BIT SECONDARYMONO SECONDARYSTEREO

Framerates
Scene 00 97.854 fps
Scene 01 24.497 fps
Scene 02 30.870 fps
Scene 03 23.988 fps
Scene 04 5.596 fps
Scene 05 7.864 fps
Scene 06 3.691 fps
Scene 07 9.862 fps
Scene 08 26.927 fps
Scene 09 18.267 fps
Scene 10 30.047 fps
Scene 11 13.968 fps
Scene 12 8.623 fps
Scene 13 10.173 fps
Scene 14 10.888 fps
Scene 15 21.992 fps
Scene 16 8.859 fps
Scene 17 21.365 fps
Scene 18 16.885 fps
Scene 19 4.765 fps
Scene 20 7.841 fps
Scene 21 9.300 fps
Scene 22 3.095 fps
Scene 23 18.908 fps
Scene 24 25.906 fps

Overall average framerate: 18.481 fps



Mam toho jeste vic, i srovnani driveru tak trosku, budou jeste vysledky na P4 3.2 a to k cemu by byl zajem muzu dodat vysledky pro srovnani.

Surround Gaming jeste zkusim (pry no problem u her s textovy configem, treba v UT2003.ini zadam proste 2400x600 a ma to jet).

Screenshoty kvality obrazu taky nejake mam, pozdej uploadnu do adresare na netu, vsechno i detailni vysledky.



Jinak vsechny ty testy, ztraty fps pri FSAA a Surround Gamingu uz otestovali stejne tady:
http://www.beyond3d.com/reviews/matrox/parhelia/

co to taktovani? tusim ze par MHz navic by ji mohlo docela pomoct :)

ice: no, zklamu te ....

v tom pitomym programku od Matroxu to jde o 4% (z 207/259 synchronne, si to spocti, kolik to je)

pak jsem zkusil PowerStripem a tam uz to slo lepe na 220/290(580) MHz, jadro uz ani o chlup vice, pak uz to rovnou pada

pomuze to teda minimalne, protoze pameti jsou uz i tak slusne propustny

mam i testy zpomaleni u Surroundu gamingu (diky Matrox Apptimizer2 se to fakt celkem rychle spousti, rovnou za vas napise do .cfg souboru her potrebne radky) a s FAA 16x

mam toho popravde tolik, ze premyslim, ze to sesumiruju do nejakyho clanku, uvidime jak s casem a chuti

jinak zrovna bysli ty drivery 1.06.... nejen jako beta, mozna to s tim jeste projedu znova



deekay: zkousel jsem tu kvalitu na sekundaru, jak ses ptal a je naprosto stejna - perfektni, zadnej problem s tim (me osobne vic stve ze u trech monitoru se jede podle nejslabsiho - rozliseni a hlavne refresh :-(, chce to hold tri stejny)

Nemáte někdo funkční link na Matrox Parhelia ReefDemo??? Matrox ho na stránkách už nemá...

nemaj to aspon na FTPku?

kdyztak muzes zkusit toto:
http://games.bigpond.com/pc/resource...ails/html/5180
(chce to registraci, ale to uz se nejak vyplni)

kdyby nic, tak to nekde vystavim ke stazeni

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal no-X

Nemáte někdo funkční link na Matrox Parhelia ReefDemo??? Matrox ho na stránkách už nemá...

---

Dík. Ale už jsem to zkoušel. Bohužel už tam taky není :-(...

http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xjahoda/parhelia/

kdybyste nekdo jeste touzili po stazeni toho Reef Dema, tak to tam jeste par dni necham ....

je tam i SharkMark a perlicka - Parhelia Reviewer's Guide :-)

Enjoy!

hezké recenze, postaršího data:
http://www.beyond3d.com/reviews/matr...elia/index.php
http://www.digit-life.com/articles/parhelia/

to katoo - jak šlape :-) ???

Eeee sorry to jsem se upsal :-)))))

má to být to Lisp:

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal oblak

to katoo - jak šlape :-) ???

---

nejak mne nedochazi souvislost s timhle threadem ???

2x PIII 1.1/512 SDR/ Parhelia 512/128 (207/235)Driver Version 6.13.01.1454

3DMARK2001_SE
DISPLAY
Platform Matrox Parhelia
CPU Optimization D3D Pure Hardware T&L
Width 1024
Height 768
Depth 32 bit
Z-Buffering 24 bit
Texture Format Compressed
Buffering Double
Refresh Rate 60 Hz
FSAA Mode None

RESULTS
3DMark Score 5793
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 79.7 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 27.9 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 103.0 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 62.1 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 85.0 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 38.1 fps
Game 4 - Nature 27.7 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 629.1 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2073.7 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 18.1 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 9.5 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 84.7 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 91.8 fps
Vertex Shader 81.7 fps
Pixel Shader 80.7 fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 69.4 fps
Point Sprites 11.4 MSprites/s

DISPLAY
Platform Matrox Parhelia
CPU Optimization D3D Pure Hardware T&L
Width 1024
Height 768
Depth 32 bit
Z-Buffering 24 bit
Texture Format Compressed
Buffering Double
Refresh Rate 60 Hz
FSAA Mode 16x

RESULTS
3DMark Score 4443
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 66.5 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 27.3 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 63.1 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 39.6 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 72.0 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 35.9 fps
Game 4 - Nature 18.4 fps
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 624.1 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 2063.6 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 12.8 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 8.6 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping 53.9 fps
DOT3 Bump Mapping 51.7 fps
Vertex Shader 33.2 fps
Pixel Shader 69.1 fps
Advanced Pixel Shader 41.6 fps
Point Sprites 5.3 MSprites/s

Codecreatures Benchmark Pro(version 1.0.0)
Official Score: 1230
DETAILS:

average number of frames per second
1600x1200 -> 9.5
1280x1024 -> 12.4
1024x768 -> 15.8

max. number of frames per second
1600x1200 -> 14
1280x1024 -> 18
1024x768 -> 20

average number of polys per second
1600x1200 -> 4.1 mio.
1280x1024 -> 5.0 mio.
1024x768 -> 5.8 mio.

max. number of polys per second
1600x1200 -> 7.1 mio.
1280x1024 -> 8.1 mio.
1024x768 -> 9.0 mio.

total amount of frames
1600x1200 -> 1237
1280x1024 -> 1624
1024x768 -> 2071

s FA16x - Official Score: 609
DETAILS:

average number of frames per second
1600x1200 -> 4.6
1280x1024 -> 6.0
1024x768 -> 8.2

max. number of frames per second
1600x1200 -> 6
1280x1024 -> 9
1024x768 -> 14

average number of polys per second
1600x1200 -> 1.4 mio.
1280x1024 -> 1.9 mio.
1024x768 -> 2.8 mio.

max. number of polys per second
1600x1200 -> 1.9 mio.
1280x1024 -> 2.5 mio.
1024x768 -> 3.7 mio.

total amount of frames
1600x1200 -> 488
1280x1024 -> 632
1024x768 -> 865

UT2003
dm-antalus
12.378374 / 22.661467 / 46.444283 fps
Score = 22.673269
br-anubis
12.876871 / 39.185478 / 89.707268 fps
Score = 39.188629
dm-asbestos
14.874428 / 34.803322 / 73.694122 fps
Score = 34.827618
ctf-citadel
11.734617 / 27.313183 / 66.561432 fps
Score = 27.351410
dm-antalus
39.357132 / 73.366051 / 349.950714 fps
Score = 73.406090
dm-asbestos
30.672394 / 91.803490 / 305.661072 fps
Score = 91.876152
ctf-citadel
21.310293 / 62.627621 / 201.249405 fps
Score = 62.771683

s FA16x
dm-antalus
11.482016 / 21.168625 / 46.615082 fps
Score = 21.179562
br-anubis
12.044168 / 36.318272 / 89.887260 fps
Score = 36.321712
dm-asbestos
13.946832 / 32.271465 / 73.967361 fps
Score = 32.298576
ctf-citadel
10.972765 / 25.522097 / 67.019997 fps
Score = 25.554743
dm-antalus
29.382355 / 64.558647 / 360.060974 fps
Score = 64.593147
dm-asbestos
22.046347 / 77.447517 / 294.752289 fps
Score = 77.499130
ctf-citadel
19.856377 / 57.701469 / 199.941925 fps
Score = 57.836945

VillageMark v1.17
Average FPS: 74
Benchmark: 1800 frames
Resolution: 1024x768x32
HAL: ON
T&L: ON
Trilinear: ON
Texture compression: ON
Multitexture: 3 layers
Max. Texture used: 1024x1024

ten teksturink ma EXTRA slabulinky...

Mne vilagemark ani neukaze vysledok... vraj 0fps...

Citace:

---

Původně odeslal Wuuduu

Mne vilagemark ani neukaze vysledok... vraj 0fps...

---

Musis si hold dat vyssi rozliseni ...

VillageMark pocita vysledek z intervalu 2 sekund a kdyz je to rychleji (hodne vysoke fps), tak neziskas korektni vysledek ...

Jinak Parhelia ma texturing prave velice dobry, ale malo co vyuzije konfiguraci 4x4 (pipelines x text. jednotky) a kdyz uz VillageMark pouzije alespon 3 layery, tak zase Parhelia nema sanci protoze tam nejsou zadny Occlusion culling apod. (HyperZ, LMA nebo jak chcete)

Možná by nebylo marný zkusit ještě Templemark (sice jsou sem-tam použity víc než 4 vrstvy, ale i tak by to stálo za to) :-)

Mě překvapila rychlost Fragemet AA. Je to pěkné ;D

tomu verim...